[PATCH] firmware: Convert to using %pOF instead of full_name

[Rob Herring]

Now that we have a custom printf format specifier, convert users of
full_name to use %pOF instead. This is preparation to remove storing
of the full path string for each node.

Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <***@kernel.org>
Cc: Sudeep Holla <***@arm.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <***@arm.com>
Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi <***@arm.com>
Cc: linux-arm-***@lists.infradead.org
---
drivers/firmware/arm_scpi.c | 2 +-
drivers/firmware/psci.c | 4 ++--
2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_scpi.c b/drivers/firmware/arm_scpi.c
index 8043e51de897..59190c374696 100644
--- a/drivers/firmware/arm_scpi.c
+++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_scpi.c
@@ -965,7 +965,7 @@ static int scpi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)

count = of_count_phandle_with_args(np, "mboxes", "#mbox-cells");
if (count < 0) {
- dev_err(dev, "no mboxes property in '%s'\n", np->full_name);
+ dev_err(dev, "no mboxes property in '%pOF'\n", np);
return -ENODEV;
}

diff --git a/drivers/firmware/psci.c b/drivers/firmware/psci.c
index 493a56a4cfc4..d687ca3d5049 100644
--- a/drivers/firmware/psci.c
+++ b/drivers/firmware/psci.c
@@ -280,8 +280,8 @@ static int psci_dt_cpu_init_idle(struct device_node *cpu_node, int cpu)
"arm,psci-suspend-param",
&state);
if (ret) {
- pr_warn(" * %s missing arm,psci-suspend-param property\n",
- state_node->full_name);
+ pr_warn(" * %pOF missing arm,psci-suspend-param property\n",
+ state_node);
of_node_put(state_node);
goto free_mem;
}
--
2.11.0

[Sudeep Holla]

Post by Rob Herring
Now that we have a custom printf format specifier, convert users of
full_name to use %pOF instead. This is preparation to remove storing
of the full path string for each node.
---
drivers/firmware/arm_scpi.c | 2 +-
drivers/firmware/psci.c | 4 ++--
2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_scpi.c b/drivers/firmware/arm_scpi.c
index 8043e51de897..59190c374696 100644
--- a/drivers/firmware/arm_scpi.c
+++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_scpi.c
@@ -965,7 +965,7 @@ static int scpi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
count = of_count_phandle_with_args(np, "mboxes", "#mbox-cells");
if (count < 0) {
- dev_err(dev, "no mboxes property in '%s'\n", np->full_name);
+ dev_err(dev, "no mboxes property in '%pOF'\n", np);
return -ENODEV;
}

(For the SCPI part)
Acked-by: Sudeep Holla <***@arm.com>

I assume you will ask ARM-SoC guys to pick this up. Let us know if you
think otherwise.